Navigating the Future: Understanding California Privacy 2026

Navigating the Future: Understanding California Privacy 2026

Photo by ‘Towfiqu barbhuiya’ on Unsplash.com

Navigating the Future: Understanding California Privacy 2026

 

California’s privacy landscape is undergoing a significant transformation. As technology advances and data usage becomes more pervasive, the Golden State is updating its regulations to better protect consumer rights and establish clearer guidelines for businesses. Understanding these changes is crucial for both individuals and organizations operating within or serving California residents.

This article will explore the evolution of California’s privacy laws, focusing on the anticipated developments leading into 2026. We will examine the key changes expected, their likely impact on businesses and consumers, and practical strategies for navigating this evolving regulatory environment. Furthermore, we will consider the role of technology in shaping these laws and offer predictions for the future of privacy in California.

The Shifting Sands of California Privacy

California has historically been at the forefront of consumer privacy protection in the United States. The state’s pioneering legislation has often set a precedent for other jurisdictions. The current framework, primarily established by the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), has been a cornerstone for data rights. However, the digital world does not stand still, and neither do privacy concerns. The need for adaptation and refinement of these laws is a continuous process, driven by new technologies, emerging data practices, and evolving public expectations.

From CCPA to CPRA: A Stepping Stone

The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), enacted in 2018 and effective in 2020, was a landmark piece of legislation. It granted California consumers a set of rights regarding their personal information, including the right to know what data is collected, the right to request deletion of that data, and the right to opt-out of the sale of their personal information. This act was a significant step forward in empowering individuals in the digital age.

The CCPA also introduced obligations for businesses, such as providing privacy notices and implementing reasonable security measures. The implementation of the CCPA was a complex undertaking for many organizations, requiring significant adjustments to their data handling practices. It served as a crucial learning period, highlighting areas where further clarity and stronger protections were needed.

The California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), passed in 2020 and largely effective in 2023, built upon the foundation of the CCPThe CPRA expanded consumer rights, introduced new categories of sensitive personal information, and established the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA). This agency plays a vital role in enforcing and implementing privacy regulations. For businesses, the CPRA represented an elevation of compliance standards, demanding a more nuanced approach to data management and transparency. It signaled a commitment to continuously strengthen consumer privacy.

Key Changes and Updates on the Horizon

The evolution of California privacy laws is not a static event but a dynamic process. As we look towards 2026, further refinements and expansions of the existing legal framework are anticipated. These updates are designed to address new challenges and to solidify consumer control over their digital footprint.

Expanding the Scope of Sensitive Data

A significant area of development is the ongoing scrutiny and potential expansion of what constitutes “sensitive personal information.” The CPRA already introduced a definition for this category, including data like social security numbers, precise geolocation, racial or ethnic origin, religious or philosophical beliefs, union membership, contents of communications, genetic data, and biometric data for identification purposes. Future iterations of the law may broaden this definition to encompass other data types that, if misused, could pose significant harm to individuals. This includes information about an individual’s health, financial information, and even certain categories of online behavior that reveal deeply personal aspects of their lives. The aim is to provide enhanced protection for data that is particularly vulnerable and carries a higher risk of misuse.

Refinements in Data Minimization and Purpose Limitation

The principle of data minimization, which advocates for collecting only the data that is necessary for a specific purpose, is gaining prominence. Future regulations are likely to place greater emphasis on this concept, requiring businesses to clearly demonstrate why specific data points are collected and how they align with stated purposes. Similarly, purpose limitation, the idea that data should only be used for the purposes for which it was collected, will likely see further reinforcement. This means businesses may need to re-evaluate their data processing activities to ensure they are not engaging in secondary uses of data without explicit consent or a clear legal basis. This push reflects a desire to move away from a model of broad data collection and toward a more targeted and privacy-conscious approach.

Enhanced Rights for Children’s Data

Protecting children’s data is a critical concern, and California is likely to continue strengthening regulations in this area. This could include requirements for verifiable parental consent for the collection and processing of children’s personal information, stricter limitations on targeted advertising directed at minors, and obligations for businesses to conduct data protection impact assessments specifically for children’s data processing. The focus here is on creating a safer digital environment for young individuals.

The Role of the CPPA in Enforcement

The California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) is a key player in the ongoing development and enforcement of these laws. As the agency gains more experience and resources, its enforcement activities are expected to become more robust. This could involve increased investigations, the issuance of more significant fines for non-compliance, and the development of new guidance and regulations. Businesses should anticipate the CPPA to be an active force in shaping the privacy landscape.

Impact on Businesses: A Changing Operating Environment

The evolution of California privacy laws has a profound impact on how businesses operate, particularly those that collect, process, or share the personal information of California residents. The regulatory environment is becoming more demanding, requiring a proactive and adaptable approach.

Adapting Data Handling Practices

Businesses are faced with the imperative to scrutinize and revise their data handling practices. This includes everything from how data is collected at the point of interaction to how it is stored, processed, and eventually deleted. A thorough understanding of data flows, known as data mapping, is essential to identify where and how personal information is being used. This exercise acts as a diagnostic tool, revealing potential areas of non-compliance and informing necessary adjustments.

Transparency and Consent Mechanisms

The emphasis on transparency means businesses must be clear and accessible in their privacy notices. These notices should not be buried in lengthy legal documents but presented in a way that consumers can easily understand. Obtaining valid consent for certain data processing activities will also become more critical. This involves moving beyond pre-checked boxes and implementing affirmative opt-in mechanisms where required. The goal is to ensure consumers are making informed choices about their data.

Security and Risk Assessment Obligations

With increased data privacy come heightened security obligations. Businesses must implement reasonable security measures to protect personal information from unauthorized access, disclosure, or alteration. This may involve investing in advanced security technologies and conducting regular security audits. Furthermore, data protection impact assessments (DPIAs) are likely to become more prevalent, especially for processing activities that pose a high risk to consumer privacy. These assessments are a proactive measure to identify and mitigate potential privacy harms before they occur.

The Challenge of Data Sharing and Third-Party Management

Data sharing with third parties, a common practice for many businesses, is a particularly complex area under California privacy laws. The definition of “sale” and “sharing” has been interpreted broadly, and businesses must be diligent in managing their relationships with third-party vendors. This includes ensuring that these vendors also comply with privacy regulations and have appropriate contractual safeguards in place. Understanding the entire ecosystem of data processing is no longer an option but a necessity.

Navigating Compliance: A Continuous Journey

Compliance Area Metrics
Regulatory Changes Number of new regulations implemented
Training Percentage of employees trained on compliance policies
Audits Number of internal and external audits conducted
Incidents Number of compliance incidents reported

Achieving and maintaining compliance with California’s privacy regulations is not a one-time task but an ongoing process. The evolving nature of the laws necessitates a commitment to continuous monitoring and adaptation.

Building a Culture of Privacy

Perhaps the most critical aspect of navigating compliance is fostering a strong culture of privacy within an organization. This means embedding privacy considerations into the design of products and services from the outset, known as privacy-by-design and privacy-by-default. It also involves providing regular training to employees on privacy policies and procedures. When privacy is a shared responsibility, compliance becomes more ingrained and less of a burdensome add-on.

Leveraging Technology for Compliance

Technology can be a powerful ally in managing privacy compliance. Various solutions are emerging to assist businesses with tasks such as consent management, data discovery and classification, access request fulfillment, and the automation of data deletion processes. These tools can streamline compliance efforts, reduce manual effort, and improve accuracy. However, it’s important to remember that technology is a tool, and it must be implemented and managed effectively.

Seeking Expert Guidance

Given the complexity and evolving nature of privacy laws, seeking expert legal and technical guidance is often advisable. Privacy professionals can help businesses interpret the regulations, identify compliance gaps, and develop effective strategies. They can also stay abreast of the latest legal developments and provide timely advice. This external perspective can be invaluable in navigating the intricacies of privacy compliance.

Regular Audits and Assessments

Just as a ship needs regular maintenance to stay on course, businesses need to conduct regular internal and external audits of their privacy practices. These audits help to identify any deviations from policies, assess the effectiveness of implemented controls, and ensure ongoing compliance. Privacy assessments, particularly for new or high-risk data processing activities, are crucial for proactive risk management.

Future Trends and Predictions for 2026

Looking ahead to 2026, several trends are likely to shape the future of California privacy laws and their impact. The landscape is not static, and we can anticipate further developments.

Increased Interoperability with Other Jurisdictions

As more states enact their own privacy laws, there will be a growing need for interoperability. California’s laws, being among the most comprehensive, will likely continue to influence regulations in other states. Businesses may see a push for more standardized approaches to data rights and obligations across the US, simplifying compliance for entities operating nationwide. This could lead to a more harmonized, though still fragmented, national privacy framework.

Greater Focus on Data Broker Accountability

Data brokers, companies that buy and sell personal information, are likely to face increased scrutiny and regulation. California has already taken steps in this direction, and future developments may include more comprehensive registration requirements, enhanced transparency obligations, and stricter limitations on their data collection and sharing practices. The aim is to bring more sunlight into the opaque world of data brokerage.

The Rise of Data Trusts and Alternative Data Models

Concerns about data concentration and control may lead to the exploration of alternative data models, such as data trusts or cooperatives. These models could empower individuals to collectively manage and monetize their data, shifting power away from large tech companies. While still in nascent stages, these concepts could become more prominent in discussions about the future of data governance. The idea is to give individuals more agency in the digital economy.

Technological Innovation and Its Privacy Implications

The relentless pace of technological innovation will continue to be a primary driver of privacy evolution. Emerging technologies like generative AI, the metaverse, and advanced biometric identification systems will present new privacy challenges. Legislators and regulators will grapple with how to apply existing privacy principles to these novel contexts, and new regulations or amendments to existing laws may be necessary to address these emerging concerns effectively. The challenge for regulators is to keep pace with the speed of innovation.

Consumer Empowerment Through Education and Advocacy

As individuals become more aware of their data rights, consumer advocacy groups and educational initiatives will play an increasingly important role. A more informed and engaged consumer base will likely demand greater accountability from businesses and push for stronger privacy protections. This is the engine of change, driven by an informed populace.

The Role of Technology in Shaping California Privacy Laws

Technology is not merely a subject of privacy laws; it is also a powerful force shaping their direction and implementation. The constant innovation in data collection, processing, and analysis necessitates a dynamic regulatory response.

Driving the Need for New Protections

Many of the privacy concerns that led to the enactment of the CCPA and CPRA were directly the result of technological advancements. The rise of big data analytics, social media platforms, and the Internet of Things (IoT) created new ways for personal information to be collected and used. As new technologies emerge, such as advanced AI and immersive virtual environments, they create new paradigms of data interaction that inevitably prompt discussions about privacy.

Enabling and Hindering Compliance

Technology can both enable and hinder compliance with privacy laws. On one hand, as mentioned, privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) offer solutions for data anonymization, secure data processing, and efficient management of consumer rights requests. These tools can automate complex tasks and reduce the burden of compliance. On the other hand, the sophisticated tools used by some entities for data mining and profiling can make it more challenging for consumers to understand how their data is being used and for regulators to detect violations. The very tools that facilitate data analysis can also create a veil of opacity.

The Influence of AI on Data Processing

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a particularly influential technological force. AI algorithms are capable of processing vast amounts of data to derive insights, personalize experiences, and automate decision-making. This raises questions about algorithmic bias, the transparency of AI decision-making, and the potential for AI to infer sensitive information about individuals. Future privacy laws will likely need to address the unique privacy implications of AI more directly, potentially requiring explainability of AI decisions and audits for algorithmic fairness.

The Evolving Nature of Data Collection

The methods of data collection are also constantly evolving, driven by technological innovation. From sophisticated tracking technologies used on websites and mobile apps to the ongoing proliferation of sensors in our environment, the volume and variety of data collected are continuously expanding. This necessitates that privacy laws remain adaptable to new forms of data capture and the potential privacy risks they present. The physical world is becoming increasingly digitized, and with it, new forms of personal data are being generated.

Best Practices for Adapting to California Privacy Regulations in 2026

As the regulatory landscape continues to evolve, businesses must remain agile and proactive. Adopting a set of best practices will be crucial for successfully navigating the California privacy environment in 2026 and beyond.

Conduct Regular Data Audits and Inventory

The foundation of any effective privacy program is a comprehensive understanding of the data an organization collects, processes, and shares. Regularly conducting data audits and maintaining an up-to-date data inventory will help businesses identify all personal information in their possession, understand its source, and track its movement throughout the organization. This process acts as a continuous health check for your data ecosystem.

Implement Robust Consent Management Systems

For data processing activities that require consumer consent, businesses must have reliable consent management systems in place. These systems should not only capture consent but also manage revocation of consent and ensure that consent preferences are respected across all relevant systems and processes. This requires a system that is both user-friendly and technically sound.

Develop Clear and Accessible Privacy Policies

Privacy policies should be more than just a legal formality. They should be written in clear, understandable language and easily accessible to consumers. Regularly reviewing and updating these policies to reflect changes in business practices and legal requirements is essential. Think of your privacy policy as a user manual for your data practices.

Foster a Privacy-Conscious Organizational Culture

Encouraging a culture of privacy throughout the organization is paramount. This involves providing ongoing training to employees on privacy best practices, privacy policies, and relevant regulations. When every employee understands their role in protecting consumer data, compliance becomes more effectively ingrained in daily operations.

Proactively Monitor Regulatory Developments

The landscape of privacy law is dynamic. Businesses should actively monitor changes in California privacy laws and regulations, as well as those in other relevant jurisdictions. Subscribing to industry updates, engaging with privacy professionals, and participating in relevant forums can help organizations stay informed and adapt their strategies accordingly. Staying ahead of the curve is key to avoiding future compliance issues.

Integrate Privacy into Product Development Lifecycle

Privacy considerations should be integrated into the design and development of new products, services, and features from the earliest stages. This “privacy-by-design” approach ensures that privacy is not an afterthought but a fundamental aspect of how data is handled. It’s about building privacy into the DNA of your offerings.

By embracing these best practices, businesses can build a strong foundation for privacy compliance, foster trust with consumers, and navigate the evolving privacy landscape of California with greater confidence. The journey of adapting to these regulations is ongoing, but with diligent effort and a proactive mindset, organizations can meet the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead.

 

 

Office: (415) 287-6251
182 Howard Street, Unit #711
San Francisco, CA. 94105

 

 

Let’s Connect

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Digital Leaders Need to Understand the European Accessibility Act

Digital Leaders Need to Understand the European Accessibility Act

Businesses must provide digital access for disabled persons or face fines and loss of crucial markets under the European Accessibility Act.

Automation saves time. Accessibility technologies in content processes enable firms detect compliance concerns before publishing and avoid costly blunders.

The inclusion pays off. An accessible website may reach a $13 trillion market and build consumer loyalty.

Some companies are scrambling to satisfy the European Accessibility Act (EAA) standards. Any company with over 10 workers and $2.15 million in annual revenue that does business in Europe must make its website more accessible to people with visual, motor, auditory, and cognitive impairments or face harsh penalties.

CMOs are under pressure, but it’s excellent. The EAA requires all enterprises to comply with the law, but it’s also an opportunity to make the internet more inclusive and user-friendly. Disability demographics have always been overlooked in marketing. This trend is insensitive, discriminatory, and very exclusive, and it ignores the disability market’s $13 trillion spending power. Therefore, organizations who cultivate strong relationships with this group will gain.

Government agencies, travel businesses, software providers, and CMS and DXP providers will be greatly affected by new restrictions. Smaller organizations may not recognize the significance of the issue until it’s too late, whereas larger worldwide enterprises are undoubtedly aware of the requirements and working on compliance.

The European Accessibility Act is comprehensive, so businesses should read European Commission guidance. In summary, compliance criteria fall into four categories.

  • -Perceivability. Perceptive content helps visually, and hearing-impaired persons understand and access information.
  • -Operability. Site users must be able to explore and engage without a mouse (think keyboarders or voice command users).
  • -Understandability. To make the site accessible to everybody, utilize clear language and navigation.
  • -Robust. Screen readers and voice recognition software must work with all content.
  • North American Businesses Should Know About the European Accessibility Act
    The EU Accessibility Act (Directive EU 2019/882) specifies digital and physical accessibility criteria for products and services. If you’re a North American business selling into the European market and fall under the EEA’s compliance parameters, here’s what you need to know to stay compliant by the 2025 enforcement deadline. “Microenterprises,” defined in the Act as businesses with fewer than 10 employees and annual revenue under $2.1 million, are exempt from some compliance standards. See the European Accessibility Act in full.

Explaining Key Aspect Why North American Businesses Care
The What Directive (EU) 2019/882 requires products and services to be accessible to disabled people and allow free mobility in the internal market. Businesses selling into the EU must meet certain accessibility standards to stay or grow.
This applies to makers, importers, and distributors in the EU, including those outside the EU. Even non-EU North American companies selling EU products or digital services must comply.
Topics covered Web sites, ecommerce platforms, smartphones, banking services, ebooks, transport services, and self-service terminals like ATMs and ticket machines are included. By June 28, 2025, North American companies selling or operating these in the EU must meet accessibility criteria.

EU countries have to implement the directive and businesses must harmonize digital products.
Non-Compliance Impact Non-compliant enterprises may be fined, restricted, or excluded from the EU market depending on Member State enforcement. International brands may lose market access or reputation if they don’t comply.

EAA compliance is significant for companies with extensive websites. Here are some expert tips to speed up digital compliance.

Create an EAA Compliance Action Plan
Even though the deadline seems far off, marketers and engineers must prepare today by knowing how laws affect different organization kinds. It’s amazing how often this easy step gets overlooked.

Start by creating an accessibility action plan that includes providing alternative text for visual elements, transcripts and captions for video and audio content, initiative navigation and user interfaces for assistive technology like screen readers, accessible forms like buttons and interactive elements, and multiple feedback channels. Digital experience providers must post an accessibility statement and routinely audit and test accessibility for disabled users. The plan should detail each piece and its timetable. Digital accessibility boosts customer loyalty and inclusion.

Facilitating Accessibility using Templates
The European Accessibility Act emphasizes straightforward and accessible design from the start. This compliance difficulty may need establishing a template with the correct specs so marketers may change and publish compliant pages.

But this solution has a significant catch. Larger companies with distinct brand requirements cannot utilize off-the-shelf templates because they limit marketers’ layout creativity. Marketers and designers must collaborate to ensure templates comply with new accessibility laws and don’t look generic.

How Automation Meets Accessibility Standards
Marketing automation can identify compliance issues in content generation and publishing workflows with the correct integrations. Image alt text, video captions, and accessible navigation are also checked during system setup. If there are difficulties, the content is identified and posting is paused.

Automation can detect small human faults that go unreported. This preventive approach can save corporations from steep fines or market restrictions.

Use Specialized Accessibility Tools
DXPs provide basic assistance, but CMOs should incorporate third-party accessibility technologies to ensure compliance for all user types. Some examples:

  • -SiteImprove directly assesses website accessibility.
  • Marketers use screen readers to grasp audio-based internet navigation.
  • Visitors can use smart chatbots to find information quickly.
  • Other tools examine color contrast for colorblind individuals and ensure screen readers can read website content.

 

Office: (415) 287-6251
182 Howard Street, Unit #711
San Francisco, CA. 94105

 

 

Let’s Connect

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Google Gets Cheesy! Importance of Transparency and Labeling AI-generated Content to Build Trust.

Google Gets Cheesy! Importance of Transparency and Labeling AI-generated Content to Build Trust.

Key stat: Nearly two-thirds (65%) of US adults feel at least somewhat uncomfortable about AI-generated ads, according to September 2024 data from EMARKETER and CivicScience.

Beyond the chart:

  • Despite their concerns, 48% of US adults believe using AI to sell products will be prevalent in the next few years, according to the same data.

  • But human oversight is still necessary—Google had to recently remake one of its ads created with AI because it contained an incorrect fact about cheese consumption. However, Google claims it wasn’t due to AI hallucinations, but rather incorrect data scraped from the web.

Your Coastside Media Axis 360 Business Roadmap

The Coastside Media Axis 360 Business Roadmap is a consultative needs assessment report that scans the web and analyzes your business’s digital marketing. The report shows how your business stacks up online in key marketing categories including reputation management, social media, website development, privacy and ADA compliance, SEO, listing accuracy and online advertising. Provide us will a little information and we will send you a complimentary report for your business.

Schedule a call today

Mobile: (415) 287-6251
Fax: (415) 287-6255
185 Howard Street #711
San Francisco, CA. 94105

Let’s Connect

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
How the company behind Dunkin’, Arby’s, and Sonic engage people

How the company behind Dunkin’, Arby’s, and Sonic engage people

Travis Freeman is the SVP of demand generation at Inspire Brands, the second-largest restaurant group in the U.S. His teams lead paid media efforts across all their brands, including Dunkin’, Arby’s, Sonic, Jimmy John’s, Buffalo Wild Wings, Baskin-Robbins, and more.

He shares his perspective on omnichannel marketing, the value of digital advertising for food and beverage brands, and his priorities for 2023.

At Inspire Brands, everything they do ties back to return on ad spend (ROAS) and their omnichannel strategy wouldn’t be possible without a unified approach to data. They have worked over the past two years to create a single technology platform for their family of brands.

This data spine enables all of their brands to work as one, using the same infrastructure to reach consumers where they actually are. One of the biggest challenges is ensuring that their guests’ needs are met as well as analyzing their data to get a better view of what they want from us.

Read In Full Here
Source: Google Think/Travis Freeman

Your Coastside Media Confidential Business Review

The Coastside Media Axis 360 Business Roadmap is a consultative needs assessment report that scans the web and analyzes your business’s digital marketing. The report shows how your business stacks up online in key marketing categories including reputation management, social media, website development, privacy and ADA compliance, SEO, listing accuracy and online advertising. Provide us will a little information and we will send you a complimentary report for your business.

Schedule a call today

Mobile: (415) 287-6251
Fax: (415) 287-6255
185 Howard Street #711
San Francisco, CA. 94105

Let’s Connect

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Federal Web Accessibility Hits Private Sector

Federal Web Accessibility Hits Private Sector

  • Federal agencies, as well as the private sector, are facing pressure due to a growing focus on web accessibility by the Department of Justice, which recently sought to increase its own online user-friendliness with a makeover of its ADA.gov website.
  • DOJ said it would make the site more “user-centered” by incorporating easier to understand language, among other upgrades.
  • The website itself offers information to employers and employees on the rights of disabled people in the workplace and in public spaces.
  • The update marks the latest move from the federal government indicating that it plans to increase focus on compliance with federal accessibility laws in the digital world, an issue that’s gained new attention in the wake of the rise of remote work during the Covid-19 pandemic.
  • Widespread telework arrangements revealed some key deficiencies in website and internet accessibility for workers with disabilities, a “digital divide” that has led to employment gaps and other negative outcomes.
  • “The real deterrent isn’t just a building without a wheelchair ramp anymore, it’s software,” said Cat Noone Stark, CEO of accessible software start-up Stark.
  • The DOJ in March issued guidance on accessibility, establishing the Biden administration’s stance that Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act applies to websites. It clarified that it interprets “places of public accommodation” to include websites.
  • The department also indicated in its Unified Agenda for Spring 2022 that it plans to issue a rulemaking on web accessibility as it relates to Title II of the ADA, which pertains directly to state and local governments’ digital presences.
  • Government Standards
  • The new ADA.gov site was designed to make it easier to scan and navigate using a screen-reader or other accessibility tools.
  • Many public-facing government websites don’t meet the mark for accessibility, according to a 2021 report from nonprofit Information Technology and Innovation Foundation.
  • The report found that 30% of homepages did not pass an automated accessibility test, and 48% failed on at least one of their three most popular pages.
  • In addition to the ADA’s accessibility requirements, the DOJ also enforces Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, which requires the federal government to procure accessible technology across its branches and agencies.
  • Another provision, Section 504, requires that federal agencies and contractors ensure that their programs and services are accessible to people with disabilities.
  • Members of Congress have stepped in to highlight the issue, including requests to get the Department of Veterans Affairs to make its web resources more accessible, and to obtain accessibility compliance data from agencies.
  • In response to an inquiry from Casey’s office, the DOJ said that it would resume audits of how federal agencies are performing on digital accessibility obligations under Section 508.
  • The section requires the DOJ to publish a biennial report on the federal government’s compliance with accessibility standards, but it has not done so since 2012.
  • Ken Nakata, a principal at Converge Accessibility, a consultancy that helps clients with web accessibility, said Section 504 was put in place in part to push the private sector, through federal contractors, to create accessible products.
  • The federal government budgeted over $58 billion for information technology in 2022 alone.
  • Federal contractors like Microsoft Corp., which collects billions in government contracts, have recently touted upgrades to make their products and services more user-friendly for people with disabilities.
  • Most recently, in Martinez v. Gutsy LLC, a judge in the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York allowed a blind man suing a probiotic beverage vendor to bring claims under Title III of the ADA. The plaintiff, Pedro Martinez, sued Gutsy because he said the website’s interface made it nearly impossible to complete a transaction as a blind person.
  • Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) and Rep. John P. Sarbanes (D-Md.) introduced the Websites and Software Applications Accessibility Act in September, which would direct the DOJ and US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to create an enforceable standard for web accessibility in the private sector.
  • Beyond the broad guidance found in the ADA, there are currently no specific federally-issued technical accessibility standards for private companies’ websites and applications.
  • Companies who want to comply with accessibility standards aren’t sure which rules to hold themselves to, according to Angela Matney, counsel at Reed Smith LLP.
  • The DOJ has indicated through enforcement actions that the standard they’re generally looking to is the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2 AA, which is the standard the government looks to when complying with Section 508, Matney said.

SOURCE: Bloomberg Law

The Coastside Media Axis 360 Business Roadmap